# Built for launch, not just for changes.

> Sitepager tracks what changes on a site between updates. Frank checks a build before launch and lines it up with the Figma design. Here's how they compare.

https://www.usefrank.io/compare/sitepager

Sitepager is strong at spotting what changed between updates. Frank is built for the moment before launch: checking every page for filler, links and accessibility, and reviewing it against the design.

## Frank and Sitepager, compared.

| | Frank | Sitepager |
|---|---|---|
| Lorem ipsum detection | Yes | Not listed |
| Broken link checking | Yes | Yes |
| Alt text checks | Yes | Yes |
| Accessibility checks | Built-in checks | Lighthouse reports |
| Page side by side with its Figma design | Yes | Not listed |
| Visual changes since the last update | No | Yes |
| Staging compared with production | No | Yes |
| Team markers with comments | Yes | Not listed |
| Projects | Unlimited on every plan | 3, 10 or unlimited websites by plan |

_Competitor details taken from their public websites on 19 October 2026. Check their sites for current features and pricing._

## The right tool for the job.

- **Choose Frank**: You're launching new builds and want lorem ipsum, link and accessibility checks, a score for every page, a side-by-side Figma review and markers for your team.
- **Choose Sitepager**: You maintain live sites and want to see visual changes between updates, or compare staging with production before publishing.
- **Use both**: Frank before launch, change monitoring after it.

## Frequently asked questions about Frank vs Sitepager

### Is Frank a Sitepager alternative?

For pre-launch QA on new builds, yes. If your priority is monitoring visual changes on a site you already maintain, Sitepager is built for that.

### Does Frank compare staging with production?

No. Frank checks the site you point it at and reviews it against Figma. Run it on staging before launch and on production after.