# Find the issues before anyone has to report them.

> BugHerd collects visual feedback from clients and teams. Frank runs automated QA checks on every page. Here's how they compare.

https://www.usefrank.io/compare/bugherd

BugHerd is built for collecting feedback: clients and teammates pin comments onto a live site. Frank checks every page automatically first, then lets your team pin what's left.

## Frank and BugHerd, compared.

| | Frank | BugHerd |
|---|---|---|
| Lorem ipsum detection | Yes | No |
| Broken link checking | Yes | No |
| Alt text and accessibility checks | Yes | No |
| Score for every page | Yes | No |
| Pin issues on the page | Yes | Yes |
| Comments on issues | Yes | Yes |
| Page side by side with its Figma design | Yes | Feedback on Figma files |
| Client feedback on the live site | No | Yes |
| Task board | No | Yes |
| Starting price | £39/month | $50/month |
| Projects | Unlimited | See BugHerd's plans |

_Competitor details taken from their public websites on 19 October 2026. Check their sites for current features and pricing._

## The right tool for the job.

- **Choose Frank**: You want automated checks for lorem ipsum, broken links and accessibility on every page, a score per page and a side-by-side Figma review, before anyone else sees the site.
- **Choose BugHerd**: Your main need is collecting feedback from clients directly on the live site and managing it as tasks on a board.
- **Use both**: Run Frank before the client review so they're not reporting broken links and filler, then collect their feedback however you prefer.

## Frequently asked questions about Frank vs BugHerd

### Is Frank a BugHerd alternative?

For pre-launch QA, yes: Frank finds issues automatically rather than waiting for someone to report them. If you mainly need client feedback collection, BugHerd is built for that.

### Can clients leave feedback in Frank?

No. Frank's markers are internal to your team. Collect client feedback in your usual way, after Frank has caught the mechanical issues.